Our rights are under attack! Support your favorite pro Bill of Rights organization by donating and actively participating at the grass roots level or more directly if the opportunity presents itself. Volume 2 – 6.5 Grendel Reloading Handbook.Volume 1 – 6.5 Grendel Reloaders Handbook.Bullet Design Considerations: key dimensions, etc.Estimating Velocities for Changed Loads and Barrel Lengths.Estimate Suggested Bullet Weight by Animal Weight.Sight Pictures Using Your Drop and Drift at a Specified Range.Make Sight Pictures Using a 200 yard Zero.So, a 100% capacity load might not be out of the question. "as with any load development, you work up to max' with care".Ĭhecking established load data from the likes of ADI is all well and good, but it does not show data for WW748 or CFE223, for which OP was querying.Ī trawl of 6.5Grendell forums would suggest that CFE223 is a bit too slow for the light projectile - more suited to 100gn plus. His trial of 32gn is at significant variance to QL which advances to 37gn. My response was to volunteer info' from QL that might have improved the outcome with 223. It was brought into the discussion by the OP who stated that he had tried it and found it to be "slow as". I then went on to say that QL reports WW748 at 35gn, 98% capacity, 3460bar as being close to (theoretical) max. The original question was about using WW748, for which QuickLOAD reports a tired load if using 28gn. On what basis do you declare that "I'd not be recommending 35gr of anything in a 6.5 Grendel"? You have some public data that can be referred to?īill, it is not my intention to pick a fight over what each of us is saying. Seems to be a suggested max load? Suggested by whom? And if 33gn is OK for a 90gn projectile, would it be unreasonable to suggest that a slightly larger powder charge might be appropriate for a lighter projectile? I did say that, as with any load development, you work up to max' with care.Īnd, as you state, 33gn seems to be a suggested max load for 90gn, so 85gn wont be far off. I don't recall anything in my previous post that suggested a load of 35gn cfe223 should be used. 33gr seems to be a suggested max load for 90gr so 85gr wont be far off.ĬFE223 work extremely well with 90-105gr in my ARC never tried it in the Grendel. Obviously too many variable but 28gr-29gr would be a very safe starting point and work your way up. Id not be recommending 35gr of anything in a 6.5 Grendel just say. You'd be getting close to that with 35gn / 3460bar / 98% case capacity.īut, as with all reloading, work up to your max with care.Įdit - QuickLOAD MV for 28gn = 2600, 35gn = 3250. No1_49er wrote:QuickLOAD figures for 748 show 28gn to be rather tired - 78% case capacity and (calculated) 1800bar pressure.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2023
Categories |